PurchasingPolicy.orgPURCHASINGPOLICYBETA
PurchasingPolicy.orgPurchasingPolicy.orgBeta

A fraction of one percent of Americans pays for our politics. See what it buys.

In the 2024 federal elections, donors who gave $2,600 or more — about 0.14% of the U.S. population — supplied $8.1 billion, more than three-quarters of all itemized individual giving. (OpenSecrets) Eight in ten Americans, across both parties, say those donors have too much influence in Washington. (Pew Research Center)

This project turns that debate into something you can check: a graph of 531,148 entities and 297,405 documented connections that traces money from donor to PAC to candidate — and on to the votes, regulations, federal contracts, and lobbying campaigns that follow. Built from FEC filings, the Federal Register, USASpending.gov, Congressional voting records, and lobbying disclosures.

Case studyRepublished from OpenSecrets, with our analysis

OpenSecrets found $52 million of outside money in one Senate primary. We followed it one layer further — and it stops.

The United Democracy Project’s $80.3 million war chest is usually described as pro-Israel donor money. Itemized, it is more specific than that: AIPAC’s own 501(c)(4) treasury supplied $51.6 million of it in direct transfers since 2022 — including $25 million on a single day in September 2025. Because that 501(c)(4) is a nonprofit and does not disclose its own donors, more than a third of the money behind the blitz is, in disclosure terms, a dead end by design.

$51.6M
from AIPAC’s own c4 since 2022
$5M
passed through to another state’s race
$500K
from ConocoPhillips and Chevron into the “centrist Democrat” machine
Read the story and our analysis
New case studyAn original QPQ Tracker investigation

The lettuce outbreak story is a million-dollar check and a dinner. The record is longer, and worse.

Before contaminated lettuce reached American consumers, the numeric water-safety standard had been deleted and the traceability rule defunded. This study reads the contribution ledger, the lobbying filings, and the rulemaking calendar side by side, every figure verified against the FEC and the Senate lobbying database.

$3.45M
in corporate super-PAC money since 2022, verified receipt by receipt
$710K
of lobbying on “food regulation” aimed at Congress, never the FDA
2028
the year the defunded traceability rule can next be enforced
Read the case study
0.14%
of Americans supplied $8.1B of 2024 itemized giving (OpenSecrets)
80%
of Americans say big donors have too much influence (Pew)
405,665
individual donors tracked in this graph
21%
of that tracked individual giving comes from just 25 people
The few

Ten donors. $880.9M in tracked giving.

These ten are among the largest individual donors tracked in this database — out of 405,665 individual donors in the graph. Their giving spans both parties and every major spending vehicle. Each card shows where the largest share of their tracked money went; click through to see the donor's full network — the PACs they fund, the candidates those PACs support or oppose, and the policy record that follows.

Timothy Mellon
Banking-family heir; former Pan Am Systems chairman
$211.0M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: MAGA Inc ($150.0M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $197.0M
George Soros
Investor; Open Society Foundations founder
$182.4M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: DEMOCRACY PAC II ($175.0M)
Largest tracked cycle: 2022 ($175.5M)
Kenneth Griffin
Citadel founder and CEO
$110.0M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND ($89.0M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $108.4M
Stephen Schwarzman
Blackstone co-founder and CEO
$89.4M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND ($74.0M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $40.2M
Miriam Adelson
Las Vegas Sands majority owner
$77.7M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND ($77.5M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $148.3M
Dustin Moskovitz
Facebook and Asana co-founder
$50.5M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: FF PAC ($50.0M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $50.7M
Paul Singer
Elliott Management founder
$43.0M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND ($42.0M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $66.8M
Marc Andreessen
Andreessen Horowitz co-founder
$40.9M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: Fairshake ($33.5M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $42.4M
Peter Thiel
Founders Fund partner; Palantir co-founder
$39.4M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: SAVING ARIZONA PAC ($20.0M)
Largest tracked cycle: 2022 ($35.3M)
Ben Horowitz
Andreessen Horowitz co-founder
$36.5M
Tracked federal giving in this graph
Largest tracked recipient: Fairshake ($33.5M)
OpenSecrets, 2024 cycle: $42.1M

Tracked totals are FEC-itemized federal contributions ingested into this database, deduplicated for amended filings, spanning the 2016–2024 cycles — coverage varies by donor, so these are a floor, not a full-cycle total, and will differ from figures reported elsewhere. Cross-reference: OpenSecrets, Biggest Donors, 2024 cycle. See methodology.

Case study — what QPQ data can show

The crypto industry, 2024–2026: from checks to law in eighteen months.

One industry, one election cycle, one complete chain in the data — donors to PACs, PACs to races, races to legislation, legislation to the agency rulebook. Every step below links into the graph. Crypto corporations put more than $170M into intervening in 2024 congressional races, more than a third of all disclosed corporate election spending that cycle (Public Citizen).

1

The money goes in

A short list of corporate and individual funders — Coinbase, Jump Crypto, Marc Andreessen, and Ben Horowitz among them — supplies the Fairshake super-PAC network and its affiliates Defend American Jobs and Protect Progress. Coinbase alone accounts for $75.5M of that across the 2024 FEC cycle — $50.5M before election day, and another $25.0M banked in December 2024, after the votes were counted. Each funder's itemized contributions, with FEC filing links, are on their entity page.
2

The money is spent

The crypto-aligned super PACs together spent more than $135M in the 2024 cycle, on candidates of both parties (CNBC); Fairshake's own FEC-reported outside spending was $40.7M (OpenSecrets). Defend American Jobs backed Bernie Moreno against Senator Sherrod Brown, who chaired the Senate Banking Committee and was among the industry's most prominent skeptics. Fairshake spent $10.1M in tracked independent expenditures opposing Katie Porter in California's open Senate primary.
3

The seats change

Moreno won; Brown, a three-term incumbent, lost. Porter finished third in her primary. Across the map, the industry entered 2025 with a Congress measurably friendlier to digital-asset legislation. See every race the money touched →
4

The rules change

On July 17, 2025 the CLARITY Act passed the House; on July 18, 2025 the GENIUS Act — the stablecoin framework the industry sought — was signed into law. Since then this database has tracked 9 federal implementing regulations writing that framework into the agency rulebook. Follow the rulemaking →

Correlation is not proof of causation — but every link in this chain is a public record: an FEC filing, a certified election result, a roll-call vote, a Federal Register entry. Follow it yourself.

Open this network in the graph
Elections reshaped

Concentrated money doesn't just elect. It removes.

Independent-expenditure campaigns funded by a handful of donors decided who appeared on November ballots at all. Three documented removals from the 2024 cycle — and one reminder that money doesn't always win.

Jamaal Bowman

U.S. House, NY-16
United Democracy Project (AIPAC's super PAC) spent $9.9M in tracked independent expenditures opposing him, in what Politico called the most expensive House primary on record. He lost the June 2024 primary with 41.2% of the vote.

Cori Bush

U.S. House, MO-01
United Democracy Project spent $5.2M in tracked independent expenditures opposing her. She lost her August 2024 primary to Wesley Bell.

Katie Porter

U.S. Senate primary, CA
Fairshake spent $10.1M in tracked independent expenditures opposing her. She finished third in California's open primary; Schiff and Garvey advanced.

Money isn't destiny

The counter-example
In 2022, Peter Thiel put $20M (tracked) into Saving Arizona PAC backing Blake Masters and $15M into Protect Ohio Values backing J.D. Vance. Vance won his Senate race; Masters lost his. Concentrated money shapes the ballot — it doesn't guarantee the outcome.

"Tracked" figures are the independent-expenditure filings ingested into this database and can undercount full-cycle totals reported by the FEC. Every figure links to its filings on the entity page.

The gap

Americans of both parties think money runs Washington. This data lets you check.

Public opinion tells you what Americans believe. Public records tell you what actually happened. This project connects the two — so the debate about money in politics can run on receipts instead of suspicion.

What Americans say
80%
say big campaign donors have too much influence on decisions made by members of Congress
73%
say the same of lobbyists and special interests
72%
support limits on campaign spending — with comparable majorities in both parties
Source: Pew Research Center, September 2023 (survey of 8,480 U.S. adults)
Start your investigation

Pick a thread. Pull it.

Not sure where to start? These investigations drop you into the graph at a key entity. Click any node to expand its connections — donors reveal their PACs, PACs reveal their candidates, candidates reveal their votes and the government contracts they steer. Pull corporate records on any donor. Go wherever the data takes you.

Your investigation. The government's data. We organized it and built the tool so you can explore it.

1

Search any name

Type a donor, PAC, candidate, company, or agency. The graph loads every documented connection — donations, federal contracts, corporate filings, and voting records.

2

Click any node to dig deeper

Every node is a doorway. Click a PAC to see who funds it. Click a candidate to see their donors, their votes, and the government contracts awarded to their backers.

3

Follow the chain wherever it leads

Trace money from corporate donor to PAC to candidate to federal contract. Pull corporate records from OpenCorporates. Every link cites FEC filings, USASpending.gov, Congressional records, or lobbying disclosures.

Featured Investigation

One donor put more behind U.S.-Israel policy than any other.

Act I

The casino heiress who became a one-woman lobby.

Miriam Adelson inherited the Las Vegas Sands fortune from her late husband Sheldon Adelson and continued his role as the largest single Republican donor advocating for U.S. security support to Israel. Her donations dwarf the giving of pro-Israel PACs.

Act II

$25 million to the cause she cares about most.

Across the 2024 cycle Adelson directed at least $25 million in disclosed federal contributions toward candidates and causes aligned with the U.S.-Israel security relationship and Jewish-community priorities, including support for the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act and the Antisemitism Awareness Act.

$25M
in disclosed federal donations from Adelson alone
Act III

The bills she advocated for passed.

Both of her top-priority bills cleared the chambers in 2024. Her giving aligns with positions taken publicly by the candidates she supported.

  • Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (H.R.8034) — enacted
  • Antisemitism Awareness Act (H.R.6090) — passed House
  • Backed candidates who voted YES on both bills
  • Continues the political program of the late Sheldon Adelson
Up for grabs right now

Rules being written. Rules being torn up.

Federal regulations don't live in a vacuum. Every comment period draws lobbyists, trade associations, and citizen groups arguing for and against. Below, the rules with the most fought-over comment trails — and the rules that got rolled back this cycle.

Go deeper

531,148 entities. 297,405 connections. Start anywhere.

531,148 entities·297,405 relationships·3,638 votes·18,553 FARA filings·Methodology